shadesofmauve: (Default)
I'm listening to TED talks at work, currently Paul Ewald on creating gentler germs, by creating conditions that select for lower virulence.

Interesting stuff, and very clearly put -- if a parasite requires a living host for transmission, strains that quickly kill the host will die off. So, reducing opportunities for non-person-to-person transmition will create an evolutionary disadvantage for virulent strains. Cool!

Then I see this in the comments:
"But this is not domestication, this is out-competition. In other words, the organism did not ADAPT to be less of a severe pathogen, severe pathogens did not have any further advantage over milder forms."*

They forget to mention that severe pathogens actually have a disadvantage, because they incapacitate their host before the host can transmit infection.

The commenter is saying that what happens is NOT evolution...but it is, even by their own explanation. Evolution is not individual adaptation; evolution happens over populations. If the virulent strain in a viral population is "out-competed" to extinction, then the population has become less virulent.

On the happy hand, real discussion takes place in the comments! Woo!
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

shadesofmauve: (Default)
shadesofmauve

August 2017

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 789101112
131415 16171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Used Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated June 8th, 2025 10:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios